4.4.2 Surveillance and research
4.4.3 National commitment and action
Expanding multi-sectoral response is crucial in fighting against the HIV/AIDS epidemic. This demands that government sectors, NGOs, private sector entities, church organizations, etc. mainstream HIV/AIDS into their day-to-day activities. The different sectors/organizations can mainstream HIV/AIDS into two areas (i) internal or workplace domain in which attention is on the vulnerabilities and risks of people within the sector/organization; and (ii) external or target community domain in which HIV/AIDS becomes part and parcel of the interaction between the sectors/organizations and their target or client communities (UNAIDS & GTZ 2003).
Main strategies:
Key objective
Indicators
PS1 |
Percentage of large enterprises/companies that have HIV/AIDS workplace policies and programs |
PS2 |
Percentage of government offices that have integrated specific HIV/AIDS activities into their sector plan in the last 12 months |
Surveillance refers to the continuous and systematic recoding of trends of HIV infection and AIDS cases in a population and tracking behavioral data to inform and explain trends recorded in HIV/AIDS. Research is a systematic process that uses scientific methods to draw lessons or generate new knowledge. In the area of HIV/AIDS, research may include pure or basic research that takes place in a laboratory (e.g., development of a vaccine), epidemiological research (e.g., to establish an association between breast feeding and HIV infection), anthropological research to assess the cultural feasibility of introducing new nutritional habits, or economic research to assess the economic impact of HIV/AIDS.
Surveillance and research is a key component of HIV/AIDS prevention and control programs, to guide the design of appropriate programs, assess whether efforts are successful and draw lessons. Ethiopia has adopted the Second Generation HIV Surveillance. The Second Generation HIV Surveillance stresses the need to design a surveillance system that is appropriate to the stage of the epidemic in a country, focusing surveillance resources on population groups in which HIV infection is most likely to be concentrated. Second Generation HIV Surveillance uses data from Behavioral Surveillance, STI Surveillance and AIDS case reporting to interpret data gathered from sero-surveillance efforts (UNAIDS 2000).
The 2002 HIV prevalence in Ethiopia has been estimated from the HIV surveillance system based on 34 sentinel sites (antenatal clinics). In 2002, Ethiopia did the first National Behavioral Surveillance Survey (BSS) on ten target populations in selected Regions of the Country. However, the number of sentinel sites should be expanded to get better representation of the population and good estimate of HIV prevalence. Also, the BSS should cover all the eleven Regions of the Country for major target populations. In general, HIV/AIDS related epidemiological and seriocomic researches are not many in the country and require financial and technical support.
Main strategies:
Key objective
Indicators
PS3 |
Number of national level HIV/AIDS related researches carried out in the last 12 months |
PS4 |
Number of National HIV Sentinel Surveillance sites existing at the time of data collection (disaggregate by region and urban /rural) |
Decades of experience in highly politicized areas such as family planning have shown that strong political commitment is crucial to program success (MEASURE Evaluation & UNAIDS 2000). Formulation of supportive policies, strategies and legislations; government funding for HIV/AIDS activities and breaking the silence surrounding the epidemic are the main areas by which national commitment and action are reflected.
As mentioned in Chapter One, the Government of Ethiopia has taken several measures in response to the epidemic. However, as the HIV/AIDS situation is worsening, government supports need to be maintained and further strengthened to meet the challenges HIV/AIDS presents to infected and affected individuals, to employment, and health services in the country.
Main strategies:
Key objective
Indicators
PS5 |
Amount of national funds spent by the government on HIV/AIDS |
PS6 |
National composite policy index |
PS7 |
Existence of policies, strategies, guidelines and frameworks produced at national level |
PS8 |
Operationalization (at all levels) of policies, strategies, guidelines and frameworks produced at national level |
Without an efficient monitoring and evaluation capacity at all levels, it is difficult to assess progresses made towards achieving set objectives and targets. An M&E capacity can be built if sufficient budget is allocated for recruiting staff, training, purchase of necessary materials and equipment, field supervision and data collection (including surveys). Besides budget allocation, higher bodies at all levels should give management support for the smooth implementation of M&E activities.
Main strategy:
Key objective
Indicators
PS9 |
Percentage spending for M&E by HAPCO in the last 12 months |
PS10 |
Proportion of all stakeholders implementing/supporting HIV/AIDS projects/programs that submit timely reports to HAPCO using standard reporting formats |
Capacity gaps on project/program management, leadership, implementation, monitoring & evaluation and effective resource absorption affect the national response against HIV/AIDS. Also, the lack of effective coordination and information sharing results in duplication of efforts and mal-distribution of services. Such problems are more sensitive to countries, like Ethiopia, where resources are scarce. This demands developing the infrastructure, strengthening the human resource capacity through short- and long-term training packages, building better coordination among actors and creating an enabling working system set to effectively address the national emergency. Networking among public and private sectors and NGOs, CBOs, FBOs, Civil Associations and others that are implementing/supporting HIV/AIDS activities is also instrumental.
Main strategies:
Indicators
PS11 |
Number of National Partnership Forum and Joint Review meetings organized by HAPCO in the last 12 months |
PS12 |
Number of Regional HAPCOs that have installed CRIS and established an online access with National HAPCO |
PS13 |
Number of staff at Regional and Woreda level trained on M&E and Project Management by HAPCO in the last 12 months |
One of the key purposes of M&E is to assess financial utilization of projects and programs. Monitoring and evaluation of physical achievements alone measures the effectiveness of a program the extent to which the program attains its objectives. When M&E measures physical achievements in comparison with financial utilization, then it measures the efficiency of the program - how economically inputs (funds, expertise, time, etc.) are converted into results. Therefore, monitoring the financial utilization of HIV/AIDS activities helps to get an idea of the efficiency of programs and produce an overview of physical achievements against expenditures at national level.
Key objective
Indicator
PS14 |
Financial allocation and utilization in the last 12 months (disaggregated by component: BCC, Condom promotion and distribution, etc.) |