3.1 Data Collection Strategy for M&E
3.2 Country Response Information System (CRIS)
3.3 M&E Reporting Levels and Information Flow
3.3.1 Kebele level to National HAPCO
3.3.2 Health related indicators
3.4 M&E Coordination Functions
3.6 Information Dissemination on HIV/AIDS
The M&E Framework clearly defines indicators for the specific HIV/AIDS intervention areas, sources of data to generate the indicators, measurement tool, frequency of data collection, responsible body for data collection (or data source), and the method of measurement. The selection of indicators has been made through a serious of consultations with different stakeholders; and due attention has been paid to characteristics of a good indicator and elements of a good M&E system outlined in chapter 2. In this document responsible body refers to an entity/entities that is/are accountable for developing data collection methodologies, designing tools and/or collection, processing and analysis of data for the specified indicator.
HAPCO will work with all stakeholders to collect data for generating reports on the national response to HIV/AIDS. In selecting the national indicators, care has been taken to explore the possibility of utilizing all available data, routine data collection systems before suggestions are made to use survey methods. As most indicators are health related, HAPCO after a number of discussions with MoH has determined that the data collection system need to be simple and use both surveys and routine program reports. In the early stage of the M&E system development in the country it is agreed not to overburden the MoH HMIS by gathering data for indicators through routine data collection only but to explore structured surveys.
For some of the indicators, baseline data is currently available from the DHS, BSS, ANC Sentinel Surveillance, program records and UNGASS 2003 report. At national level, indicators will be collected on regular intervals as specified in chapter 6 (HIV/AIDS indicators reference page).
Data for measuring the indicators will be obtained from four main sources:
a) Routine national level surveys like the DHS, BSS and HIV Sentinel Surveillance data; Population Census, and Blood Bank data (The HIV Sentinel Surveillance data is based on antenatal clinics including women of all age groups)
|
b) Routine reports on identified indicators from all project/program implementers c) Health Facility Surveys (HFS) d) Special studies, e.g. HIV/AIDS impact assessments, policy and guideline assessments | ![]() |
Indicators that will be assessed based on routine reports require the determination of all stakeholders that are implementing/supporting HIV/AIDS activities. Stakeholders should regularly report on indicators that are relevant to the type of project/program they are implementing/supporting. In order to facilitate data flow, HAPCO will implement the Country Response Information System (CRIS) at National and Regional levels. The frequency of reporting and how reports should flow are described in subsequent sections.
CRIS, developed by UNAIDS, is an information system for national responses. The System consists of a database of standardized indicators on HIV/AIDS situation, impact and response. The CRIS platform will enable electronic communication of data from districts to regions, from regions to national level and from national to international level. It can also be electronically updated. Some of the benefits of CRIS are listed below.
|
Benefits from CRIS
|
Even though the CRIS system consisted of internationally standard indicators, it is quite possible to put additional indicators for National, Regional and Woreda consumption. The M&E Team at HAPCO will customize CRIS to local needs and establish the System for use at National and Regional levels.
Stakeholders implementing HIV/AIDS projects/programs are expected to regularly report on program indicators (Annex 2) that are relevant to the type of activity they are undertaking. For all program indicators, the data collection formats at all levels (from lowest to National level) will be developed and included in the M&E Operational Manual and distributed to all stakeholders. The proposed information flow between the different stakeholders and HAPCO are summarized in figures 3 and 4.
Standard reporting formats that summarize the program indicators will be supplied to Government Offices (Woreda, Region and National level), Kebeles, NGOs, CBOs, FBOs, Civil Associations, Multilateral and Bilateral Organizations.
|
Frequency and hierarchy of reporting (all program indicators, including health):
i) If Zonal structures exist in the Region and the Regional HAPCO has an HIV/AIDS coordinating committee at Zone level, then: ii) Otherwise (i.e., if Zonal structure does not exist in the Region), the Woreda HIV/AIDS Committee will send a copy of the report quarterly to Regional HAPCO |
Figure 3: Report/information flow: Kebele level to Federal HAPCO

Key:

Note: The M&E Operational manual will include mechanisms to minimize duplication of data/information which may
occur due to reports gathered from different sources
Most of the indicators in the M&E Framework are health related. Health related program indicators will originate from health facilities (health posts, clinics, health centers, and hospitals). It is expected that private heath institutions working at different levels will also send reports on relevant program indicators to MoH or RHBs. For all program indicators in the M&E Framework, standardized reporting formats will be developed and distributed to all actors including to health facilities. The formats will avoid any duplication of reporting that may occur.
|
Frequency and hierarchy of reporting (health related program indicators):
i) If Zonal structures exist in the Region and the Regional HAPCO has an HIV/AIDS coordinating Committee at Zone level, then: ii) Otherwise (i.e., if Zonal structure does not exist in the Region), the Woreda HIV/AIDS Committee will send a copy of the overall report quarterly to Regional HAPCO |
Note: Currently the teaching and/or specialized hospitals are Tikur Ambessa, Gonder, Dilla, St. Paul, St. Peter, Police,
Army and Jimma.
Figure 4: Report/Information flow of health related indicators

Key:
* |
In Addis Ababa, Kefle Ketema HIV/AIDS Committee |
** |
Higher health facilities: Health centers, District hospitals and Rural hospitals |
*** |
Lower health facilities: Health posts and clinics |
Note: The M&E Operational manual will include mechanisms to minimize duplication of data/information which may
occur due to reports gathered from different sources
Proclamation No. 276/2002 mandates HAPCO to coordinate the national response to HIV/AIDS. This role would involve bringing together all stakeholders who are involved in combating the epidemic for the harmonious implementation of HIV/AIDS activities. Efficient implementation of the M&E Framework also requires well established coordination mechanisms at all levels of monitoring and evaluation.
HAPCO will convene coordination meetings to bring together key implementers of HIV/AIDS projects/programs and Regions to discuss the modalities of implementing the national M&E Framework and to address whatever challenges may have arisen during the process. HAPCO will also use the National Partnership Forums to update stakeholders on the requirements of the National M&E Framework and to solicit their support for its implementation.
The indicators included in the National M&E Framework are primarily selected to measure progresses made at National level. Most of the programmatic indicators can only be measured after aggregation of data from Regions. These same indicators are useful for decision making at Regional and lower levels. However, Regions and Woredas can have their own additional indicators based on local needs. To harmonize data collection for indicators required at national level as well as for additionals for local consumption, it is necessary for Regional HAPCOs and Woreda HIV/AIDS Committees to hold regular meetings with all stakeholders working in their area. The Regions and Woredas themselves will determine the frequency of the meeting. However, semi-annual and quarterly meetings are suggested at Regional and Woreda levels, respectively.
Donors support will be very important to ensure effective and efficient implementation of the National M&E Framework. Most donors oftentimes require more information than is necessary for national level M&E. HAPCO will use the National Donors Forum to update them on the National M&E Framework so that Donors information requirements are not very much different from indicators included in the Framework.
HAPCO will produce annual National M&E reports, containing indicators that would show the multi-sectoral response to HIV/AIDS, results achieved or not achieved and lessons drawn. National level M&E results/findings will also be disseminated through annual HIV surveillance reports, HIV/AIDS fact sheets, brochures, print and electronic media and panel discussions. Federal Sector Ministries/Offices and Regional HAPCOs will also undertake dissemination of M&E results within their sectors and regions, respectively, in-order to supplement the efforts by the Federal HAPCO.
Dissemination of M&E results is expected to serves the following key purposes:
Figure 5: The National HIV/AIDS M&E System